Ashling O’Connor, Olympics Correspondent
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today

Like the television in a bar that you can’t keep your eyes off, a network of giant outdoor screens is about to provide a constant neon distraction from the charms of Britain’s historic market squares during the 2012 Olympics.
Organisers keen to ensure that the public do not miss a moment of the world’s biggest sporting event are planning to broadcast around the clock in 60 towns and cities.
The scheme to operate the largest network of public screens seen in Britain, announced today in partnership with the BBC, has been condemned as irresponsible by heritage groups.
The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) accused the London Olympics organisers of plastering the country in “digital wallpaper” after it emerged that many of the 400-inch screens would not be temporary, as originally suggested.
The first batch of screens will broadcast live coverage of the Beijing Olympics from August 8 and will become the focus of a national party on August 24 when the closing ceremony of the Games marks the official hand-over to London.
They will be Bluetooth-enabled, allowing members of the public to upload and download images and even play computer games. On hand-over day, which falls on a Bank Holiday weekend, regional choirs will assemble at the “live sites” to lead a 15-minute mass singalong incorporating a national song designed to warm up the public for 2012.
The idea of temporary screens took off at the Sydney Games in 2000 and proved popular during the 2006 football World Cup in which the Germans set up “fan zones” in 12 cities. Olympics organisers have so far announced eight permanent sites – in Bristol, Cardiff, Middlesbrough, Norwich, Plymouth, Portsmouth, Swansea and Walthamstow – and 22 temporary ones. They require full planning permission.
Civic experts, who recently heard a presentation by London 2012 after raising concerns about long-term planning issues, told The Times that the real ambition was for between 45 and 60 permanent screens. They claimed that Olympics organisers were being deliberately secretive about the true scale of the project.
“It’s not that we don’t believe in fun in public spaces but this is not urban regeneration. It’s an outdoor Currys and I find it worrying if not irresponsible,” Sarah Gaventa, director of CABE Space, said. “Without funding or proper curating, we’re going to end up with News 24 and EastEnders.”
The CABE wrote to Tessa Jowell, the Olympics Minister, last month after being “fobbed off” by 2012 executives running the cultural programme.
Other agencies said that the screens, which will have a ten-year lifespan, would destroy the aesthetics of towns with historical significance. Issues of noise pollution, crowd control and public drinking had not been considered, they added.
“This is potentially disastrous,” Michael Loveday, chairman of Living Streets, a charity for improved public spaces, said. “These things are huge – putting one randomly in a small market town will have a dramatic impact. What’s to stop it turning into something awful like a 24-hour pop video?"
The screens, which are muted overnight but emit a constant neon flicker, have been piloted by the BBC in Hull, Leeds, Bradford, Rotherham, Liverpool, Manchester, Derby and Birmingham.
The London Olympic Organising Committee is supplying the screens but local authorities will be responsible for maintenance costs. The BBC will provide the content. The project received £2.6 million of National Lottery funds but the total cost is believed to be £45 million, covered by sponsorship from BT and Lloyds TSB.
English Heritage, the Government’s adviser on historic properties, thinks that this money could be better spent. Philip Davies, its planning director, said: “It’s hard to see how the screens will add to the characters of historic city centres. The one in Hull is a horror on stalks and totally dominates the city centre.”
Civic rights groups share the concern. “This is a monstrous proposal,” Simon Davies, director of Privacy International, said. “There has to be a limit on the Orwellian intrusion into our serenity.” The Olympic organising committee said that talks with the CABE were continuing, adding: “We share the ambition that the local authorities take the best advice to make sure the screens work for all.”
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This is a horrendous proposal that will pollute the public realm with unwanted spectacles causing unwanted noise and light. It is not an issue confined to heritage street views. It is about respecting the boundaries of the public and private realms, and not having the former intrude upon the latter.
Lorens Holm, Dundee, Scotland
People saying that we won't be forced to watch these screens are missing a point - yes we can turn our eyes away, but what about our ears? The High Street will become a neon and noise hell! And didn't they put one in Manchester for football and end up with a drunk riot urinating in the street?
David, Ashford,
Now state telescreens in the street. Will we be required to join the 2 minutes hate?
BT Webwise spying on our internet connections, surveillance cameras everywhere, fingerprinting at airports, biometric ID cards.
This is Orwellian madness. New Labour seem to be using 1984 as their manifesto.
Felix, Felixtowe, UK
oh, no, TV's in British cities? Whatever will they think up next? Weaving looms powered by the infernal engines? if you don't want to see it, don't look. It is not a magic box that hypnotises (really it isn't) you stare because it is easier on the brain. Try thinking and annoy the government.
Antony Jackson, Las Vegas, USA
Can they come with a remote so we can watch something else
Pete, ed,
Margot from Fife, you don't think town centres are full of people who want to "catch up in their lunch"?
Helen, London, UK
Gross bad taste - They stuck one in city centre Liverpool a few years back and it's awful, just really bad taste - is this what we have come to?
Andrew J Iddon, London, UK
I can understand having such screen in business districts so that people can catch up in their lunch, such as the one by Canary Wharf. Town centres make no sense, they will just create noise and disturbances.
Margot, Fife,
I dont see how these things would have a significant negative impact on our lives. Yes, they should be made more discreet, but to compare it to Orwell's 1984 is not only ludicrous but also incorrect. We're not going to be forced to watch these screens, nor are they an intrusion of our privacy.
Mike, Sheffield,
People in this country are so negative and afraid of anything new. Even a TV screen is 'potentially disastrous' and 'condemned as irresponsible'. I particularly like the brief acknowledgement that these screens have been a big success everywhere else, before quickly returning to hysteria.
Tom, Sherborne, Dorset
Just where in London are these screens being placed?
Larry, Chicago, USA
There is nothing wrong with that hideous screen, the state knows what is good for you, like banning guns and knives, aren't you glad that now your streets are much safer, for hoods.
gishere, phoenix, usa
Surely the money should be spent on police? I would rather see at least one copper on the beat than a screen to watch people running around for no apparent reason and throwing spears even though its a useless skill nowadays. The hoodlums will smash up the screens anyway. Money down the drain.
dave, london,
Plymouth has one of these huge screens. It had one for Wimbledon a year or two ago and the noise level was excessive.
Mr Ian Provost, Plymouth,
What a ridiculous idea. When are the so-called 'organizors' going to realize that the public are starting to question the obsene amount of public money being wasted on the olympics? The BBC should not be allowed to spend one penny of the money that they extort from the licence payers on this either.
Chris, Derby,
just like George Orwell predicted. What a waste of tax payers money. Especially as there is nothing left in the coffers as it is
Marcus Saw, horndon on the hill, uk
Just like the big screens in 1984.
jj, Northampton,